PEMF vs Microneedling

PEMF
PEMF
Microneedling
Microneedling
comparison vs

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy utilises low-frequency electromagnetic fields to promote healing in tissues. It can prolong the growth phase of the hair growth cycle in order to inhibit hair shedding. 

Microneedling involves creating tiny punctures in the epidermis (top layer of the skin) with very small needles. By doing this, the skin’s natural healing properties are stimulated and hair growth can be promoted from dormant follicles. 

Microneedling is a minimally invasive treatment that can be performed at home or in a clinic. PEMF therapy is not invasive and there are no reported side effects but is less widely available. Explore the comparison table below to see which treatment works best for you.

PEMF Treatment
Microneedling Treatment
Introduction
Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy delivers low-level electromagnetic pulses to the scalp to boost cellular metabolism, reduce inflammation, and enhance blood flow, supporting healthier hair growth.
Microneedling uses tiny needles to create micro-injuries in the scalp, triggering collagen production and growth factor release, improving nutrient delivery to hair follicles and encouraging stronger regrowth.
Effectiveness
50%
50%
Treatment Cost
$100–$200 per session
$150–$350 per session
Treatment Duration
3–6 months of sessions (2–3 times weekly); results typically in 3–6 months
3–6 monthly sessions; visible improvement over 3–6 months
Treatment Method
Device therapy
Minimally invasive procedure
Safety
High
Medium
Ease of Use
Medium
Hard
Accessibility
Medium
Hard
Sustainability of Results
Short-Term
Medium-Term
Compatibility with Other Treatments
Easy
Medium
Emotional Appeal
Low
Low
Health Benefits Beyond Hair Loss
Medium
Medium
Environmental Impact
Low
Medium

Shop Our Hair Regrowth Products

Shop Now

Shop Our Hair Regrowth Products

Shop Now
  • PEMF uses pulsed electromagnetic fields to energise scalp tissue and promote healing.
  • It stimulates the blood flow and encourages follicular activity without physical invasion.
  • Ideal for initial hair loss.
  • Painless, non-surgical, and can be used at home.
  • Needs regular use for best results.
  • Microneedling involves using small needles to cause micro-injuries on the scalp, which stimulate the healing process and collagen formation.
  • Typically performed monthly or weekly.
  •  It can be done at home or in clinics.
  • Often used in combination with topicals.
  • Involves some mild discomfort or redness post-treatment.
  • PEMF devices can be costly upfront, but are reusable, making them cost-effective over time.
  • The initial investment is higher with home use than with micro needling, but it may be lower in the long term.
  • Microneedling devices are generally affordable, though clinic treatments cost more per session.
  • Unlike PEMF, it may involve ongoing professional fees if not self-administered.
  • PEMF is applied every day or several times a week for 15–30 minutes, depending on equipment settings.
  • It is painless in contrast to microneedling and does not require recovery time.
  • Microneedling is less frequently done, but with each session, there can be downtime due to redness or tenderness of the scalp.
  •  Unlike PEMF, treatments may need spacing to allow healing.
  • PEMF emits low-frequency electromagnetic waves to energise scalp cells and improve follicle health.
  • Unlike microneedling, it does not disrupt the surface or break the skin.
  • Microneedling involves piercing the scalp with very thin needles to promote growth factors and healing.
  • Unlike PEMF, it is a mechanical intervention that exerts its effect by controlled physical stimulation.
  • PEMF is exceptionally safe with no pain or significant side effects.
  • PEMF is suitable for people with sensitive skin or scalp disorders.
  • Microneedling is mostly safe but may possibly cause irritation, redness, or infection if performed inappropriately.
  • It requires rigorous post-care and hygiene procedures, unlike PEMF.
  • PEMF is easily incorporated into a routine using wearable or handheld devices.
  • Compared to microneedling, it requires less preparation and no recovery.
  • Microneedling requires concentration and care at home, with sessions taking longer, including setup and sanitation.
  • In contrast to PEMF, post-treatment healing adds to the time commitment.
  • PEMF devices are available online or through specialist providers but may not be widely stocked in Australian retail outlets.
  • In contrast to microneedling, they’re less common in hair treatment clinics.
  • Microneedling tools are easily found in pharmacies and online.
  • Unlike PEMF, many dermatologists and cosmetic clinics offer in-person microneedling sessions for hair loss.
  • PEMF supports long-term follicle health with ongoing use, but results taper off if stopped.
  • PEMF offers gradual improvement with no cumulative damage, unlike microneedling.
  • Microneedling can offer sustained benefits after a series of sessions.
  • Unlike PEMF, it may not require as frequent maintenance once an initial course is complete.
  • PEMF is used to supplement oral or local treatment and can be used after microneedling to help with healing and circulation.
  • It’s more versatile in potential combinations than microneedling.
  • Microneedling enhances topicals like minoxidil or PRP uptake.
  • It’s contrasted with PEMF, typically combined with active solutions to achieve maximum penetration and stimulation of the follicles.
  • PEMF appeals to users seeking gentle, tech-driven treatment without needles or irritation.
  • Unlike microneedling, it offers peace of mind for those sensitive to discomfort.
  • Microneedling attracts users seeking active, clinical-style interventions with noticeable effects.
  • Unlike PEMF, its hands-on nature may provide more apparent results in the short term.
  • PEMF enhances circulation, reduces inflammation, and stimulates cell metabolism to help repair follicles.
  • It works without physical trauma or tissue damage relative to microneedling.
  • Microneedling boosts collagen and growth factor release and can reverse follicular miniaturisation.
  • Unlike PEMF, it relies on controlled damage to trigger biological responses.
  • PEMF generates little waste once purchased and operates electrically.
  • Unlike microneedling, it is cleaner and avoids the disposal of consumables.
  • Microneedling tools may require replacement heads or full devices over time.
  • Unlike PEMF, it involves some packaging waste and single-use hygiene products in clinic settings.

Shop our hair solutions

We are committed to providing affordable hair regeneration services for people all over Australia. Our formula can help you regain your confidence.

Shop Now

Comparison Summary: PEMF vs Microneedling Hair Regrowth Effectiveness

PEMF therapy can be performed at home or in a clinic but sessions or an at-home device are more expensive compared to microneedling. PEMF therapy can be effective as a monotherapy but studies have not confirmed if using microneedling treatment alone can generate results. PEMF treatments are considered to be safe with no reported side effects. 

There can be some minor side effects with microneedling including redness, mild swelling, and flaking. When performed at home it is possible to spread infection if your device is not properly sanitised before and after use. PEMF at-home devices, although more expensive, since there is less competition the quality is of a high standard. 

Microneedling devices are widely available at a large price range so it’s important not to purchase a cheap device and risk their safety. PEMF is often combined with other clinical-grade treatments such as low-level laser therapy (LLLT) while microneedling is often combined with a topical treatment like minoxidil making it suitable to perform at home as part of your daily routine.

User Guidance

Since PEMF therapy has not reported any side effects, it can provide a treatment that is not too disruptive to your day-to-day routine. It is often combined with LLLT making it a non-invasive combination to tackle hair loss. 

If you’re not enjoying the expected results from topical minoxidil, adding microneedling to your routine can improve your results. A study found that microneedling and minoxidil were four times more effective compared to minoxidil on its own. 

PEMF therapy is considered safe for the majority of people but may not be suitable if you have a pacemaker or other implanted electronic device as PEMF treatments can interfere with them. Microneedling can also be used as a treatment by most people except if you have a blood disorder, active acne or diabetes you should consult with a doctor before use.

Take Our Hair Loss Quiz to See Which Treatment Suits You?

Take A Hair Quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

PEMF therapy is ideal if you want a painless, non-invasive treatment that can be used at home or in a clinic. It is well suited to those with sensitive skin or those looking for a gentle, tech-driven approach. Microneedling is a good option if you prefer a more hands-on method and want to combine it with topical treatments like minoxidil for enhanced results. Both can be effective, and your choice may depend on your comfort with devices or needles and your treatment goals.

PEMF therapy can show improvements in hair growth and reduced shedding after three to four months of consistent use, with more noticeable changes after six months. Microneedling may produce visible results after three months, with major improvements often seen after six months, especially when paired with topical solutions.

PEMF therapy is considered very safe, with no significant side effects reported. Some users may experience mild tingling or warmth, but these are temporary. Microneedling can cause redness, swelling, or mild discomfort, and if not performed hygienically, there is a risk of infection. Proper aftercare and device sanitisation are important.

Yes, PEMF and microneedling can be combined as part of a comprehensive hair regrowth routine. PEMF is often paired with other clinical treatments like laser therapy, while microneedling works well with topical solutions such as minoxidil. Using both may help address hair loss from different angles.

For PEMF, choose a device from a reputable manufacturer with good reviews and clear instructions. If opting for a clinic, ensure the staff are experienced. For microneedling, select a device approved by regulatory bodies and avoid very cheap options. At-home rollers should have shorter needles for safety, while clinical-grade devices are best used by professionals.

PEMF devices are more expensive upfront but are reusable and cost-effective over time. Microneedling devices are generally affordable for home use, but professional sessions cost more per treatment. The total cost depends on your preference for at-home or clinical care and how often you use the treatments.

Both treatments require ongoing use to maintain benefits. If you stop PEMF therapy, improvements in hair growth may gradually fade. Microneedling can provide sustained benefits after a series of sessions, but results may diminish if you do not continue with maintenance treatments.

PEMF is not suitable for people with pacemakers or implanted electronic devices. Microneedling should be avoided by those with blood disorders, active scalp infections, or diabetes, and anyone with concerns should consult their doctor before starting treatment.

Other Comparisons

See All
PEMF vs Hair Loss Shampoo
PEMF vs Hair Loss Shampoo
PEMF vs Hair Vitamins
PEMF vs Hair Vitamins
Hair Pills vs PEMF
Hair Pills vs PEMF
Hair Gummies vs PEMF
Hair Gummies vs PEMF
Microneedling vs Hair Loss Shampoo
Microneedling vs Hair Loss Shampoo
Microneedling vs Hair Vitamins
Microneedling vs Hair Vitamins
Hair Gummies vs Microneedling
Hair Gummies vs Microneedling

Take Our Hair Loss Quiz to See Which Treatment Suits You?

Take A Hair Quiz